Rand Paul has been destroying Tony Fauci for quite some time, but now he has turned his attention on Antony Blinken.

This question, answer, and response exposes a major flaw in the Biden Regime’s move of drone strikes in Afghanistan.

TIRED OF THE ADS? BECOME A PREMIUM USER TODAY!!

Are they really this incompetent, or are they just lying again?

>>>FOLLOW US ON GAB<<<

Rand Paul: If they behave, you’re going to give them the money. Why don’t we subtract the $80 billion from the $10 billion you’re going to give them? Then they’re minus 70 still. I mean, really, the fact that you’re entertaining good behavior, that they’ll get more money, I think is a big mistake and a naive notion that we’re going to somehow change this stone age philosophy by giving them more of our money. We’ve sunk trillions of dollars over there. This is our chance to have a peace dividend. Let’s quit sending good money after bad. The guy the Biden administration droned, Was he an aid worker or an ISIS K operative?

Do you think President Biden should be impeached for the crisis in Afghanistan and loss of American lives?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from RobManess.com, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Antony Blinken: The administration is, of course, reviewing that that strike. And I’m sure that uh, you know, a full assessment will be will be forthcoming.

Rand Paul: So you don’t know if it was an aid worker or an ISIS K operative?

Antony Blinken: I can’t speak to that. And I can’t speak to that in this setting. In any event.

Rand Paul: So you don’t know or won’t tell us?

Antony Blinken: I don’t I don’t know. Because we’re reviewing it.

Rand Paul: We’ll see you think you’d kind of know before you’re off somebody with a predator drone, whether he’s an aid worker, or he’s an ISIS K. See the thing is, is this isn’t just you, it’s been going on for administration, after administration. The Obama administration droned hundreds and hundreds of people. And the thing is, is there is blowback to that. I mean, I don’t know if it’s true, but I see these pictures of these beautiful children that were killed in the attack. If that’s true, and not propaganda, if that’s true, guess what, maybe you created hundreds or 1000’s of new potential terrorists from bombing the wrong people. So you got to know who, you can’t sort of have an investigation after we kill people. We have an investigation before we kill people.

***FOLLOW US ON TELEGRAM***

So do you think there’s an actual investigation going on, or are they working on a cover-up to their incompetence?

Or maybe it wasn’t even incompetence, but a purposeful strike saying they killed an enemy to distract from the withdrawal debacle.

At this point, we wouldn’t put anything past them.

People from around the Twittersphere had a few things to say as well…

“The drone strike happened 2 weeks ago, and they still can’t identify who they hit?”

“They know full well who they hit.”

“They were very sure who they were hitting before they hit, but not after?”

“In this administration, four days ago is past the expiration date.”

“They are investigating the investigation.”

“They just droned somebody to prove to the public that Biden was tough on ISIS…and they knew most Americans have the attention span of tree moss, so a soundbite was all that was needed to shut them up. They murdered someone for political points.”

“They know, it’s called the super slow walk and deniability action of the administration.”

“The Biden Administration is a joke.”

Cut Out Big Tech And Advertise With Red Voice Media Directly

This piece was written by Zach Heilman on September 15, 2021. It originally appeared in RedVoiceMedia.com and is used by permission.

Read more at RedVoiceMedia.com:
Biden Told OSHA to Hide Info on Vaccine Side Effects – Lara Logan [VIDEO]
Pandemic of the Unvaccinated Narrative Pushed In News Outlet’s FB Post Doesn’t Go As Planned [VIDEO]
Biden In Hot Water As It’s Revealed His Ancestors Owned Slaves

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Rob Maness.